Here we go again and again and again – the “religious right” or merely the religious zealots are out in full force and once again promising they will sit at home and not vote with Donald J. Trump as GOP candidate.
These “Republicans” are no better then the GOP establishment cowards like Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan who tell us they can’t support a Trump candidacy. One the last failed GOP presidential nominee, the other the last failed GOP vice-presidential nominee and current Speaker of the House. HYPOCRITES!!
A look back to 2008 and 2012 provides glaring examples of why Barack Hussein Obama became POTUS. It wasn’t because he was so smart, so promising, so one-half black, so Saul Alinsky Marxist. It was primarily because individuals registered as Republicans refused to vote for McCain or Romney. Instead of holding their noses to vote they allowed Obama to become a two-term POTUS, busy fundamentally transforming our society into a third world country. And he’s not finished yet – he’s more dangerous than ever because time is running out.
Do enough homework, read enough material, perform your own due diligence and you’ll find history is repeating itself as the self-righteous “children of God” (in their own narrow minds) are preparing to stay home on election day in November and open the door to a disaster called a Hillary R. Clinton presidency. Not only would this be a continuation of Obama but it would be injected with growth hormones and steroids. Hillary Clinton, an Alinskyite and former pen pal of the self-proclaimed Communist is as far left as any candidate, including Bernie Sanders, she just doesn’t call herself a Socialist.
Donald Trump is incendiary with his comments but listen closely. His remarks are easily supported by facts. Lyin’ Ted Cruz is a liar, Jeb Bush is dull and “low energy”, John Kasich didn’t create jobs, the discovery of oil in Ohio and extraction by private industry created jobs. Oh yes, Donald Trump drops bombs, swears a little, comes off nasty because he realized that nice hasn’t played well in the past. Refusing to say Barack Obama’s middle name Hussein may have been politically correct but it wasn’t telling it like it is, it was playing nice while Obama and his henchman took off the gloves and went full frontal street fighting. Hillary Clinton and her money machine will do the same but even more. Donald Trump is a street fighter, he is smart and he will backup his comments and keep his promises.
So don’t give up on God but use some common sense. VOTE and VOTE against Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders and VOTE for Donald J. Trump. It’s America’s last stand against tyranny. Are you part of the problem or part of the solution?
Want some statistical facts? Read…..
On and on we go, the never ending discussion of Hillary Clinton’s private email server, classified, top-secret documents, smoke, mirrors, lies, more lies and of course, denial.
It looks like the FBI investigation is on its stretch run with the FBI providing immunity to the person who set up the servers, IT specialist Bryan Pagliano, at first taking the fifth amendment, now chirping according to one anonymous source who described him as a “devastating witness.”
With the election for POTUS coming up and Clinton the presumptive Democrat nominee the FBI and Justice Department would likely prefer to get this all over with so FBI Director is going to interview Hillary personally. The FBI and prosecutors are likely to also interview Clinton’s top aides including Cheryl Mills.
If indeed the investigation is coming to and end before any conclusion is announced I would say all this escalation might be more smoke and mirrors so the Obama administration and Clinton’s can proudly say every stone was turned over, every avenue was searched and they found that nothing illegal was done by Hillary or her staff. Maybe they hang an underling out to dry but I’m betting this all gets washed aside and the press will sing the praises of justice.
I think this is all done with a wink, a nod and a Kabuki dance. The Congressional investigations, the House Benghazi Committee, the interviews, the testimony, the hearings were all for show and once again, Hillary Clinton will go unscathed. Hopefully, she will never get to the Oval Office and merely go away. With that said, I still believe Hillary Clinton is the most corrupt woman in the United States. She belongs in an orange jumpsuit not running for President. There is a double standard for some, it’s unfortunate, but business as usual in the every corrupt political world.
I certainly hope I’m wrong and Hillary Clinton faces the full force of the American justice system in a way that it’s supposed to work. Criminals go to jail!
You’ve probably heard that Hillary Clinton was very close to Saul Alinsky, a self-avowed Communist, mentor to Barack Obama, professional community organizer and author of Rules for Radicals.
Hillary included Saul Alinsky and his book in her college thesis yet acts as if she is center left and bi-partisan. After all, turncoats like John McCain think the world of HRC and call her a very good friend.
Even the Left, aka Democrat Party members, might prefer Marxist Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) as a possible candidate for POTUS in 2016 and there is a movement to get her to run.
This hasn’t gone unnoticed to Hillary since she is now mimicking Warren’s “you didn’t build that” mantra, also adopted by Obama. Clinton, like Warren and Obama has now gone public telling us that businesses and corporations don’t create jobs. If that isn’t Marxism then please, tell what is.
At a Democratic rally in Massachusetts, Hillary Clinton’s attempt to attack “trickle-down economics,” resulted in a spectacularly odd statement. She is also developing a “vocal fry” as she speaks.
“Don’t let anybody tell you that raising the minimum wage will kill jobs, they always say that. “Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs.”
The Clinton clan is enormously wealth, accomplished at lying and making the lie stick, and will have her huge following. Warren or Clinton, America will continue to be in very big trouble.
See also: The Hillary Letters
I’ve written plenty on the erstwhile Hillary Clinton who commands $40K+ for a short speech about nothing. For all the media accolades Mrs. Clinton really has a pathetic resume, specifically as Secretary of State. Here is a short list:
- Canceling missile-defense cooperation with the Czechs and Poles while resetting relations with Vladimir Putin;
- Leading from behind in Libya;
- Emphasis on climate change as a global threat;
- Pressuring Israel to grant concessions to ensure Middle East peace;
- Welcoming the election of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt;
- Ignoring requests for beefed-up security at the consulate in Benghazi;
- Claiming that the deaths of the four Americans in Benghazi were due to a spontaneous riot over a video;
- Pulling all troops out of Iraq;
- Lifting the embargos and trade sanctions against Iran;
- Traveling nearly a million miles while SOS.
But “What difference does it make?” Hillary still wants to be POTUS more than anything else. She probably give up her soon to be first grandchild to occupy the Oval Office.
I’ve written for years about Hillary Clinton’s Marxist views and tied her to self-proclaimed Chicago Community Organizing guru Saul Alinsky, author of “Rules for Radicals.” And let’s not forget the similar connection to Barack Hussein Obama and Alinsky.
Now Freedom Beacon has exposed Clinton’s communications, long denied, to Alinsky with copies of the actual letters discovered in archives for the Industrial Areas Foundation housed at the University of Texas at Austin.
The full Freedom Beacon article his here and the letters here. Read the entire article and letters to get the true flavor of Hillary Rodham Clinton and what’s really behind her ideology. Clinton’s like to come off as moderate and do the job of it well but they use their surrogates to initiate policies design to undo the Constitutional Republic we know as America.
But wait! Would Saul Alinsky recognize Hillary Clinton today and would he approve? After all, Mrs. Clinton rented out an $18 million sprawling mansion in the Hampton’s this summer. In fact, Hillary has spent most of her “off” time from government raking in millions of dollars to say much about nothing.
Not long ago Hillary Clinton told the world that her and Bill were “dead broke” upon leaving the White House. She has a way with words and facts.
Quite recently Hillary is out and about giving speeches for between 200 and 200 thousand dollars plus expenses which include her entourage, hotel suites, meals, flights on private jets and even for her advance team to ensure her heinous is given the royal treatment.
Nevada reporter Jon Ralston offered an epic rant to viewers Monday when he spared no insults against Hillary Clinton and her “royal” speaking demands:
Mr. Ralston may think America doesn’t have kings or queens but try telling that to the Clinton’s and Obama’s who spend taxpayer money on themselves, family, and friends at alarming rates.
New Yorkers have upped the ante as Nanny State Progressive Mayor Bloomberg exits city hall after twelve years of telling citizens how much soda they can consume, what type of cooking oil restaurants can use and most recently banning the use of e-cigarettes that produce harmless vapors.
Welcome the “Marxist of Manhattan” Mayor Bill de Blasio into NY city hall as he prepares to fundamentally transform the largest city in the world into a total bastion of Communist ideology.
When you invite a known Communist as keynote speaker to your iinauguration that sums up where you are going with your administration. But de Blasio hasn’t kept it a secret and his background is steeped in leftist ideology.
And who swore the newly minted mayor into office? Bill Clinton with wife Hillary standing close by. I’ve written many times that Slick Willie was a lefty who had his hand forced to the center by a Republican Congress and by his own actions that forced his impeachment. Hillary wrote her college thesis based on “Rules for Radicals” by Communist Saul Alinsky, mentor to Barack Obama. See where this is all going?
You have a Marxist radical in the White House, a Marxist looking to run for POTUS in 2016 and the worlds largest city voting overwhelmingly for a Marxist to run things. For the most part, America is well on its way to a totalitarian society. If this pattern continues for another 10-20 years the Constitution won’t even exist in the National Archives.
de Blasio once likened Colin Powell and Condi Rice to “house slaves” when in the Bush administration. Of course Powell has since relented and joined the Left. Last year de Blasio compared the free market Koch brothers to the Ku Klux Klan.
Reverend Fred Lucas Jr. joined de Blasio and spoke of continuously using metaphors of slavery referring to the five boroughs of NYC as “plantations” and managed other analogies to slavery using terms such as “shackles,” “bondage,” “auction blocks,” “the Emancipation Proclamation,” the “Civil War,” and the “Reconstruction Era.”
Obama and his ilk will be campaigning against “income inequality” this year and the new city advocate and former Legal Aid Society lawyer Letitia James ranted against “a gilded age of inequality,” “stop-and-frisk abuses,” and “land grabs for more luxury condos.” It’s beginning to look a lot like “class envy” and “Occupy Wall Street.”
Bill Clinton praised Bloomberg and the crowd provided him with stone silence when he called the city “stronger and healthier.”
But de Blasio brought the onlookers to life when he proclaimed a “new progressive direction” that will “take dead aim at the ‘Tale of Two Cities’” injustices he emphasized during his campaign.
And we’ve been to this movie before in big cities that have failed with similar projects being proposed such as affordable-housing projects, an end to hospital closures, reform of the “broken” stop-and-frisk policy, and a tax on upper-income earners. After each item, he would shout, “We won’t wait, we’ll do it now.”
Remember that “trickle down economics” the Left hates that worked so well during and after the Reagan years? The “Marxist of Manhattan” was having none of it as he tossed more red meat to his Comrades.
It’s also been suggested that the Communist MSNBC has missed an opportunity in not getting de Blasio to host a program.
An honored guest at the festivities was Bertha Lewis, the former national head of the scandal-ridden ACORN “community-organizing” group. Bill de Blasio had been a long-term project of ACORN. de Blasio had earlier released a campaign note:
“Bertha Lewis is one of the city’s most passionate and effective progressive leaders, and I’m proud to have worked with her for years.”
So ACORN, the Communist arm of Progressives is back and operating in the new New York City administration.
And visitors to NYC will see a change and will not be able to enjoy a ride in a horse drawn carriage.
“We are going to get rid of horse carriages, period,” Bill de Blasio said Monday. “We are going to quickly and aggressively move to make horse carriages no longer a part of the landscape. . . . They are not humane. They are not appropriate for the year 2014. It’s over. So, just watch us do it.”
de Blasio’s Communist connections are steep. Even the New York Times exposed many last fall and indicated he was endorsed by Barack Obama. Of course the story was buried on page 19.
- grew to be an admirer of Nicaragua’s ruling Sandinista party
- ardent supporter of the Nicaraguan revolutionaries
- recently affirmed he was “proud” to have supported the Communist junta in Nicaragua
- supporter of ACORN
- supporter of Occupy Wall Street
- proponent of taxpayer funded universal pre-kindergarten day care and after school programs
- during the Cold War de Blasio toured the Soviet Union and served as an organizer with the anti-nuclear, anti-American group Physicians for Social Responsibility
- advocate of “democratic socialism,” an ideological euphemism favored by Marxists
- In the mid-nineties, he was executive director of the New York branch of the New Party, a Marxist, ACORN-affiliated political coalition to which Barack Obama likewise belonged
- In 1994 de Blasio married former lesbian activist Chirlane McCray. They honeymooned in Fidel Castro’s Cuba, in violation of the U.S. ban on travel to that country
- In 1996 de Blasio ran the New York state operation for the Clinton-Gore re-election campaign.
- ran the Hillary Clinton Senatorial campaign
- While serving on City Council, in 2002 de Blasio participated in a City Hall ceremony honoring the vicious, Robert Mugabe, the openly anti-white, Marxist dictator of Zimbabwe
Historian Ron Radosh describes de Blasio as:
”…a far left radical whose ancestors are the New Left and the Communists,” and “a bona fide red diaper baby” who, “like many of his generation … kept his parents’ … pro-Communist politics not far from his heart.”
While drooling over Comrade Hillary Clinton de Blasio proclaimed:
It Takes A Village. “Your groundbreaking commitment to nurturing our children and families manifested itself in a phrase that is now a part of our American culture – and something we believe in deeply in this city. It Takes A Village.”
And while ripping free markets de Blasio continued:
“We are called to put an end to economic and social inequalities that threaten to unravel the city we love. And so today, we commit to a new progressive direction in New York. And that same progressive impulse has written our city’s history. It’s in our DNA.”
“We do not ask more of the wealthy to punish success. We do it to create more success stories.”
That’s called “redistribution of wealth” and at the heart of Marxism. Don’t teach a man to fish; teach him to burglarize homes and steal his neighbors’ fish.
H. L. Mencken once said: “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”
New Yorkers best get ready, they are about to get what they voted for – good and hard!
So much politics, so little time. So much corruption in politics which brings me to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
Mr. Obama is truly proving himself an incompetent in many facets of government including economics, foreign affairs, leadership and any other category I may offer at this site. He may very well fit into the Sports category since he finds so much time to spend golfing, if that’s what you want to call it. He’s a duffer in and outside of the White House and all around.
Then we have the erstwhile Hillary Clinton protector of husband Bill and his indiscretions and bungler of foreign policy, leaving office with Benghazi, Libya hanging over her head, but what does it matter, that was a long time ago she once chimed.
Politicians are self-serving creatures and you really can’t find two people in the highest levels of government any more self-serving than Barack Obama and Hilliary Clinton. To use a cliche – they will throw anyone under the bus if it helps them. Anyone.
As they say in Chicago – politics ain’t beanbag – but we’re not playing “beanbag”, we’re playing the future of freedom and liberty in America and it’s time people wake up to that and march on Washington and local offices of their representatives coast to coast to demand better.
And don’t say you weren’t warned – don’t continue to be a low information voter, someone who doesn’t like the GOP candidate so you opt out of voting and help give it away to the opposition. Yes opposition to the US Constitution.
And you’ve been warned throughout the years in my little piece of the blogosphere. It’s all here, news, views, opinions and many facts to substantiate why Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are a disaster for the continuation of America as written down in the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution.
Incompetent, yet power hungry slithering snakes, that’s the description I have for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. They care about their Marxist style agenda’s and personal legacies so they may go down in the ill-written history books by so-called biographers and historians who seemingly never get the facts correct in their ambition to re-write history. Then America’s children get that false information shoved down their throats and into their heads full of mush by teachers with union protection or life tenure who want to aid and abet in the brainwashing of American’s youth. If that youth is even paying attention while texting during a class.
Yes, much of the information on Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama is here or you may simply use the convenient search box in the upper right hand navigation bar. Educate yourself on Hillary Clinton if you haven’t already but with Barack Obama the horse has left the barn as he continues to fundamentally transform America in his attempt to make it in his own image.
Hillary Clinton isn’t thinking about running for POTUS in 2016, it’s her lifelong ambition and she wants that more than anything in the world. And so many people support her and the GOP may very well have a candidate unworthy for office and incapable of defeating her. Such audacity, indeed.
Hillary Clinton commenced her 2016 drive towards the White House a week ago, and it was not an encouraging introduction.
The past first lady and Senator utilized her initial major policy address since departing the State Department to depict US election laws as being essentially racist.
The address ended up being lengthier on anecdotes compared to data, therefore, allow me to fill up a number of the gaps.
“In 2013, so far, more than 80 bills restricting voting rights have been introduced in 31 states,” Mrs. Clinton informed her political base of attorneys from the American Bar Association. Clinton described these particular laws as part of an endeavor reaching back decades to “disproportionately impact African-Americans, Latino and young voters.”
And she tossed the Supreme Court in as an element of her racist conspiracy theory, assailing their latest determination finding the “preclearance” portion of the Voting Rights Act as unconstitutional.
Hillary professed the High Court had “struck at the heart” of this law, even though all it did was in fact remove a portion which had compelled such states as Mississippi to satisfy higher legal challenges with regard to election laws compared to various other states having a worse existing history associated with minority voter engagement.
“Now not every obstacle is related to race,” Mrs. Clinton added, “but anyone who says that racial discrimination is no longer a problem in American elections must not be paying attention.”
Nobody believes racial discrimination has disappeared from American life or even the human condition. But as for minority voting, Mrs. Clinton is definitely the person who has not been taking note. Particularly, she must have overlooked the May 2013 Census Bureau analysis on “The Diversifying Electorate-Voting Rates by Race and Hispanic Origin in 2012 (and Other Recent Elections).”
The research, based upon details belonging to the November 2012 Current Population Survey, demonstrates minority voter turnout across the country continues to be growing – significantly so. Consider blacks, who as recently as 1996 experienced a lower voter turnout level of 53%.
As the nearby graph demonstrates, black turnout has leaped in every of the previous four presidential elections. In 2012, black turnout as a general share of all eligible voters surpassed the turnout of non-Hispanic white voters – 66.2% to 64.1%. Almost five million more African-Americans voted during 2012 (17.8 million) as compared to voters in 2000 (12.9 million). Both in 2008 and 2012, black voters actually surpassed their share associated with the eligible black voting age populace. In 2012, blacks comprised 12.5% of the eligible voters yet 13.4% of those voting.
Having Barack Obama on top of the ticket undoubtedly assisted this particular black voter mobilization, however the pattern demonstrates the surge preceded his own candidacy. Recall when liberals described Bill Clinton as being “America’s first black President”? Black turnout surge sped up following Mr. Clinton’s final election. This type of huge boost in black voter turnout throughout 16 years would appear to oppose the statement by Mrs. Clinton that racial road blocks to voting tend to be escalating.
Mrs. Clinton disregards more or less everything and concentrates alternatively upon anecdotes, while raising alarm concerning the voter ID laws and regulations which have been introduced during the last decade. Clinton especially elevates concerns with regards to North and South Carolina. However the exact same Census Bureau analysis demonstrates black turnout surpassed non-Hispanic white turnout by statistically substantial levels in both Carolinas, and ended up being larger in the majority of states east of the Mississippi River beyond New England.
North Carolina, she states, has this current year “pushed through a bill that reads like the greatest hits of voter suppression.” Yet this designed horror exhibit simply decreases early voting by one week, and halts same-day enrollment and increasing voting hours through political desire. Virtually all of these are meant to protect ballot integrity, which happens to be as critical as voter accessibility to public assurance when it comes to trustworthy elections. Voters lacking any ID may get one free of charge at the Department of Motor Vehicles plus they may also cast a provisional ballot pending verification that they’re legitimately registered.
Incidentally, Georgia, Indiana as well as Tennessee currently have some of the most stringent voter ID laws from the more than 30 states which have these kinds of laws, however the Census report affirms black turnout surpassed that of non-Hispanic whites in 2012 in virtually all three. Where’s the proof that voter ID laws help keep minorities from voting?
This detachment between these basic facts combined with Mrs. Clinton’s claims implies that she actually is the individual actively playing racial politics. The existing slim Democrat majority is essentially a coalition based upon gender combined with racial identity. It demands large turnout amongst single women along with non-whites. As the Obama years wind down, the concern between Democrats is the fact that these particular voters do not possess exactly the same commitment.
Mrs. Clinton plays this “first woman President” card, yet she likewise requires a significant minority turnout. If Hillary cannot inspire that turnout in accordance with growing economic expectations or perhaps opportunity, which happens to be difficult due to the Obama economic history, she along with Democrats will engage in racial fearfulness to generate it. Hillary Clinton needs a racially polarized electorate.
This is really a misfortune for America, and Republicans including Mitt Romney easily share the responsibility with regard to doing so little to appeal to minority voters. However, this approach along with Hillary. Clinton’s address do not bode well to have significantly less polarized politics while Democrats attempt to prolong their electoral dominance.
Mrs. Clinton billed her address a week ago as the very first of a sequence dealing with what she referred to as “eroding public trust” inside government. Government can use the assistance, however, please note the paradox in which Mrs. Clinton’s political party continues to be operating the government while its standing sinks.
Regardless, stoking racial fears determined by fabricated government racism is not going to help make Americans feel good about politics or even government.
Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies is a book written by conservative author Michelle Malkin. But the term “Culture of Corruption” can go back as far as politics has existed.
But we’re talking about the Clinton’s now, specifically Bill and Hillary. How did Bill get the nicknames “Slick Willie” or “Three Dollar Bill”? This wasn’t an accident. Hillary had a host of scandals as First Lady including “Travelgate,” “Whitewater,” “Filegate,” and the “Hillary Rodham Cattle Futures Controversy.” Let’s not forget the mysterious “suicide” of Vince Foster, a friend and law partner to Ms. Clinton.
Then of course we have Bill and Monica Lewinsky and subsequent impeachment for lying under oath and disbarment. Hillary, always loyal to Bill and collective power blamed it all on a “Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy.”
I suppose all those sexual misconduct allegations were just white noise. All the lady’s involved conspired to lie about Bill and his sexual desires. Let’s see, we have Paul Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Wiley, Juanita Broaddrick, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Dolly Kyle Browning, not to mention Monica Lewinsky.
Ronald Reagan was called the “Teflon President” concerning arms sales and mafia boss John Gotti also earned the moniker. But who resembles the non-stick coating of Teflon better than Bill and Hillary Clinton? I used the word “alleged” but so many claims and most of them merely went away. So many investigations and no criminal charges to Bill and Hillary overall but some associates went to prison or were humiliated by a press in the tank for Clinton Inc.
Oh, and did I not mention dereliction of duty as Secretary of State involving Benghazi? There is much more out there on this corrupt power couple but let’s stick to the big ones.
This all leads me to the recent NY Times story concerning the Clinton Foundation, soon to be renamed the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. They may rethink that if this story goes beyond a one day news cycle. Of course, although the liberal Gray Lady splashed a huge controversy on a couple they have long protected, will anything come of the deficits being run by a non-profit foundation that has collected millions of dollars ($492M), which is run by Clinton confidantes and mismanaged to the tune of at least $43 million?
Bill and Hillary intend to move their foundation offices to Manhattan so more money will be going down the drain for this “non-profit” money laundering scheme. It’s been said this move will serve as a “launching pad into 2016” for Hillary. What is she “launching?”
“I think having a place such as this for a platform gives her a great launching pad into 2016,” said former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs. “It gives her, quite frankly, a great place with which to create or begin to create the message she would use should she decide to run.”
Decide to run? Does anyone think the Clinton’s don’t want a return to the White House? Does anyone think that Hillary Clinton doesn’t believe she deserves to be POTUS? It’s what these people live for.
There is supposedly an “internal review” going on at the foundation being led by daughter Chelsea Clinton. She has “become increasingly concerned” that some overseers were negatively impacting the non-profit. This is code for “it’s time to start producing fall guys and people to blame.”
The NY Times says this:
For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.
. . . efforts to insulate the foundation from potential conflicts have highlighted just how difficult it can be to disentangle the Clintons’ charity work from Mr Clinton’s moneymaking ventures and Mrs Clinton’s political future.
What will this do to the political future of Hillary. I doubt anything, they all have a way of beating scandals and surviving their way to the top. But since the focus is on the future, what about foreign donations to US presidential politics. It was a big deal swept under the carpet for Obama in two elections.
A nexus between Clinton Foundation donors, foreign governments, and corporate interests has long been a concern to government watchdog groups. As of 2008, the Clinton Foundation raised at least $46 million from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Brunei, Oman, and other foreign governments—the very governments Secretary of State Hillary Clinton eventually negotiated with. Wealthy foreign investors, like Saudi businessman Nasser Al-Rashid and Indian politician Amar Singh gave at least $1 million each.
The NY Times says that cronyism and conflicts have reached critical mass. I presume the coverup is about to begin in earnest. It’s what the Clinton’s do best.
I ask the question in my title because we’ve seen the puffing by politicians before and the end result is not as advertised.
RNC Chairman, Reince Preibus, sent letters to CNN and NBC because they are planning to product films of Hillary Clinton’s life. Actually, “celebrating” her life. Hmmmm….Saul Alinsky would be proud along with Karl Marx.
If the two media outlets move forward Preibus has promised to inflict damage by way of 2016 debates for 2016 primaries or Presidential debates. The presumption here is Hillary Clinton will run for POTUS in 2016 and CNN and NBC are contributing to her campaign by promoting her in film.
Priebus wrote to CNN:
I find CNN’s actions disturbing and disappointing. Your credibility as a supposedly unbiased news network will most certainly be jeopardized by the decision to show political favoritism and produce an extended commercial for Secretary Clinton’s nascent campaign.
And to NBC:
I find this disturbing and disappointing. NBC cannot purport to be a neutral party in American politics, and the credibility of NBC News, already damaged by the partisanship of MSNBC, will be further undermined by the actions of NBC Universal executives who have taken it upon themselves to produce an extended commercial for Secretary Clinton’s nascent campaign.
Priebus will ask for a binding vote at the August 14 RNC summer meeting to bar the party from partnering with, or sanctioning, any primary or Presidential debate with the two networks unless NBC and CNN officially drop their plans for film promotion for Hillary Clinton and her expected 2016 campaign for POTUS.