While the media and political class is busy gushing in regards to the “greatness” of Nelson Mandela currently following his death, an important counterpoint with the remainder of the narrative is actually sorely necessary. Below is a video interview of South African missionary Peter Hammond, who explains the actual reality regarding Mandela.
Described as being a liberator through the press, Mandela had been a Marxist as well as convicted terrorist. Hammond links Mandela to this:
Nelson Mandela admitted in open court-pleaded “guilty”-and remember, he was trained as a lawyer-he pleaded “guilty” to 156 acts of public violence and terrorism.
He was the head of the revolutionary terrorist wing of the ANC [African National Congress] “Umkhonto we Sizwe.” And he was behind so many different operations: from the plotting of bombs in the railway station (which killed women and children, which crippled people), bombs in shopping centers, attacks on farmers, . . . so many acts of violence.
“There is nothing sacred or inherently superior about non-violent methods of struggle.”
Mr. Hammond procedes to point out that contemporary portrayals help to make Mandela out to be considered a saint, yet by no means refer to the reason why he had been inside prison in the first place. It had been for good and just purpose.
“Not even the Amnesty International would take his case, because they said he wasn’t a political prisoner. He had had a fair trial and a reasonable sentence. He had his day in court. He was not a political prisoner. He was in jail for acts of violence.”
Hammond correlates the particular criminal offenses by which Mandela was presented with life incarceration in South Africa, he’d been given the death penalty in the United States or Great Britain during the time. It was subsequently the actual political environment which afterwards got Mandela discharged, and leftist revisionism which has whitewashed his earlier life associated with violence. Contrary, Mandela’s legacy is surely an argument in support of the death penalty. Whenever these kinds of criminals aren’t disposed of, often there is an opportunity potential political forces might be corrupt enough to liberate them – conceivably directly into positions associated with power.
Considering the actual facts concerning Mandela, Hammond can state,
“I’m astounded that so many in the west idolize Nelson Mandela and lift him up as a messianic figure, because they obviously don’t know what he teaches, what he believes, or what he does, or his support for some of the most radical Marxist dictatorships on the planet.”
This consists of numerous Christians:
“A lot of Christians out there idolize Nelson Mandela just because they’ve only been given false, misleading, and incomplete information.”
When Mandela became ill this past year, the press started to plan for the exact hagiography that they are currently writing concerning the fallen terrorist. Barack Obama seized the chance to visit South Africa, discussing human rights everywhere he traveled, invoking the name of Mandela at each and every location, praising his work.
One liberal NPR commentator couldn’t hold back. He reported the reality that throughout Obama’s trip to South Africa, Mandela had been too ill for any photo-op:
“The first black president of the United States standing beside the first black president of South Africa would’ve made for a powerful moment.”
Or perhaps he could have explained:
“One crypto-communist friend of terrorists standing beside a known communist and convicted terrorist would’ve made for a revealing moment.”
Inside the wake from the Boston bombings, Obama mentioned how the acts would be looked into as works of terrorism, simply because,
“Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians it is an act of terror.”
“Any time. . . .”
Yet, while responding to the death of Mandela just a few months afterwards, exactly the same person stated,
“We’ve lost one of the most influential, courageous, and profoundly good human beings that any of us will share time with on this earth.”
There is certainly without a doubt a detachment within the general public discussion.
And certainly, numerous Christians will likely be puzzled and cornered. Countless may end up ensnared through the apparent predicament produced by a whitewashed account of Mandela. In the event that oppositions, like myself, honestly condemn him, they will risk becoming openly connected as associates of apartheid and racism, in the same way proponents of states’ rights in the United States today are linked unduly with slavery and racism. Offer Mandela a free pass, nevertheless, and you actually supply a pass to his Marxist ideological background and terrorism. It appears much like a number of other lesser-of-two-evils choices made available to us.
The video originates from a missionary that judges concerns in a different way. Mr. Hammond upholds the facts inside the public square, regardless of what individuals state in opposition to him or attempt to do to him.
Mandela has gone on to take a position before his maker. We shall now determine whether God judges in accordance with the lesser of evils.
In the event that you’d desire to find out more about Mandela’s communism, merely read the publication he wrote himself, and which had been a portion of the abundant evidence utilized against him during his trial: How to Be a Good Communist.